Side-by-side comparison of Dashihuagang and Nampo port facilities and infrastructure — 331 km apart
Based on harbor characteristics, facilities, equipment and services, here is which port stands out for each use case between Dashihuagang and Nampo.
🏆 Nampo
Better-equipped for dry bulk cargo (cranes, harbor size).
Key operational metrics for Dashihuagang and Nampo. Higher TEU = more throughput, lower CO₂/TEU = greener operations.
Dashihuagang is a large coastal (breakwater) port located in China, while Nampo is a small river natural port located in North Korea. The two ports are 331 km apart.
In terms of facilities, Dashihuagang offers 8 key services, while Nampo offers 13. Dashihuagang provides shelter rated good, while Nampo provides shelter rated fair.
As international ports, Dashihuagang (China) and Nampo (North Korea) serve as key nodes in the global shipping network. Shippers routing through this region should evaluate each port based on their specific logistical needs.
Dashihuagang is classified as Large while Nampo is classified as Small.
Nampo offers 10 key facilities versus 8 at Dashihuagang.
Dashihuagang (China) and Nampo (North Korea) act as key nodes on this international trade corridor. Explore each country to find more options.
Explore more side-by-side comparisons involving these ports or similar maritime hubs.
View detailed infrastructure, shipping data, and real-time information for each port.
🏆 Dashihuagang
Stronger container terminal infrastructure.
🏆 Dashihuagang
More comprehensive ship repair capabilities.
🏆 Nampo
Wider availability of fuel, diesel and water bunkering.
🏆 Dashihuagang
Better shelter and navigation safety equipment.
Verdict is generated from publicly available harbor data; actual operational suitability depends on specific cargo, vessel and routing requirements.
Dashihuagang and Nampo are approximately 331 km apart by direct line.
No — Dashihuagang is in China while Nampo is in North Korea.
Dashihuagang provides good shelter while Nampo provides fair shelter.