Side-by-side comparison of Fishguard and Saint Peter port facilities and infrastructure — 331 km apart
Based on harbor characteristics, facilities, equipment and services, here is which port stands out for each use case between Fishguard and Saint Peter.
🏆 Fishguard
Better-equipped for dry bulk cargo (cranes, harbor size).
Key operational metrics for Fishguard and Saint Peter. Higher TEU = more throughput, lower CO₂/TEU = greener operations.
Fishguard is a small coastal breakwater port located in United Kingdom, while Saint Peter is a small coastal (breakwater) port located in Gg. The two ports are 331 km apart.
In terms of facilities, Fishguard offers 12 key services, compared to 8 for Saint Peter. Fishguard provides shelter rated good, while Saint Peter provides shelter rated fair.
As international ports, Fishguard (United Kingdom) and Saint Peter (Gg) serve as key nodes in the global shipping network. Shippers routing through this region should evaluate each port based on their specific logistical needs.
Both ports are classified as Small.
Fishguard offers 11 key facilities versus 8 at Saint Peter.
Fishguard (United Kingdom) and Saint Peter (Gg) act as key nodes on this international trade corridor. Explore each country to find more options.
View detailed infrastructure, shipping data, and real-time information for each port.
🏆 Saint Peter
Stronger container terminal infrastructure.
🏆 Fishguard
More comprehensive ship repair capabilities.
🏆 Fishguard
Wider availability of fuel, diesel and water bunkering.
🏆 Fishguard
Better shelter and navigation safety equipment.
Verdict is generated from publicly available harbor data; actual operational suitability depends on specific cargo, vessel and routing requirements.
Fishguard and Saint Peter are approximately 331 km apart by direct line.
No — Fishguard is in United Kingdom while Saint Peter is in Gg.
Fishguard provides good shelter while Saint Peter provides fair shelter.
Explore more side-by-side comparisons involving these ports or similar maritime hubs.