Side-by-side comparison of Haeju and Nampo port facilities and infrastructure — 85 km apart
Based on harbor characteristics, facilities, equipment and services, here is which port stands out for each use case between Haeju and Nampo.
🏆 Nampo
Better-equipped for dry bulk cargo (cranes, harbor size).
Key operational metrics for Haeju and Nampo. Higher TEU = more throughput, lower CO₂/TEU = greener operations.
Haeju is a very small coastal natural port located in North Korea, while Nampo is a small river natural port located in North Korea. The two ports are 85 km apart.
In terms of facilities, Haeju offers 12 key services, while Nampo offers 13. Haeju provides shelter rated fair, while Nampo provides shelter rated fair.
Both ports serve North Korea maritime trade. Choosing between Haeju and Nampo depends on cargo type, vessel size, and route requirements.
Haeju is classified as Very Small while Nampo is classified as Small.
Nampo offers 10 key facilities versus 6 at Haeju.
Haeju and Nampo both serve North Korea maritime trade. Explore other ports in the country or browse the full directory.
Explore more side-by-side comparisons involving these ports or similar maritime hubs.
View detailed infrastructure, shipping data, and real-time information for each port.
🏆 Nampo
Stronger container terminal infrastructure.
🏆 Nampo
Wider availability of fuel, diesel and water bunkering.
Verdict is generated from publicly available harbor data; actual operational suitability depends on specific cargo, vessel and routing requirements.
Haeju and Nampo are approximately 85 km apart by direct line.
Yes, Haeju and Nampo are both located in North Korea.
Haeju provides fair shelter while Nampo provides fair shelter.