Side-by-side comparison of Manila and Subic Bay port facilities and infrastructure — 74 km apart
Based on harbor characteristics, facilities, equipment and services, here is which port stands out for each use case between Manila and Subic Bay.
🏆 Manila
Better-equipped for dry bulk cargo (cranes, harbor size).
Key operational metrics for Manila and Subic Bay. Higher TEU = more throughput, lower CO₂/TEU = greener operations.
Compare which maritime carriers operate at Manila and Subic Bay, with carriers serving both ports highlighted first.
Manila is a large coastal breakwater port located in Philippines, while Subic Bay is a small coastal natural port located in Philippines. The two ports are 74 km apart.
In terms of facilities, Manila offers 14 key services, the same as Subic Bay. Manila provides shelter rated excellent, while Subic Bay provides shelter rated excellent.
Both ports serve Philippines maritime trade. Choosing between Manila and Subic Bay depends on cargo type, vessel size, and route requirements.
Manila is classified as Large while Subic Bay is classified as Small.
Manila offers 14 key facilities versus 12 at Subic Bay.
Manila and Subic Bay both serve Philippines maritime trade. Explore other ports in the country or browse the full directory.
Explore more side-by-side comparisons involving these ports or similar maritime hubs.
View detailed infrastructure, shipping data, and real-time information for each port.
🏆 Manila
Stronger container terminal infrastructure.
🏆 Manila
Wider availability of fuel, diesel and water bunkering.
Verdict is generated from publicly available harbor data; actual operational suitability depends on specific cargo, vessel and routing requirements.
Manila and Subic Bay are approximately 74 km apart by direct line.
Yes, Manila and Subic Bay are both located in Philippines.
Manila provides excellent shelter while Subic Bay provides excellent shelter.