Blue World Line vs Wan Hai Lines
Side-by-side comparison of Blue World Line and Wan Hai Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.
Blue World Line
- Headquarters
- Atlanta, United States
- Founded
- Alliance
- —
vs
Wan Hai Lines
- Headquarters
- Taipei, Taiwan
- Founded
- 1965
- Alliance
- —
Blue World Line vs Wan Hai Lines: full comparison
Fleet & capacity
Metric
Blue World Line
Wan Hai Lines
Fleet size
—
124 ships
Container fleet capacity
—
0.5 M TEU
Volume transported
—
2.8 M TEU
Owned terminals
—
7
Storage volume
—
239,000 m²
Global presence
Metric
Blue World Line
Wan Hai Lines
Ports covered
—
85
Maritime lines
—
55
Countries of presence
—
33
Environmental impact
Metric
Blue World Line
Wan Hai Lines
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
—
4,449 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
—
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
—
0.8 %
Business profile
Metric
Blue World Line
Wan Hai Lines
Annual revenue
—
3.04 B$
Alliance
—
Independent
Year established
—
1,965
Safety
Metric
Blue World Line
Wan Hai Lines
Worker fatalities
—
0
Lost-time injury frequency
—
5.84
Environmental deep dive
Blue World Line and Wan Hai Lines are evenly matched on environmental performance.
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
Blue World Line—
Wan Hai Lines4,449 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
Blue World Line—
Wan Hai Lines0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
Blue World Line—
Wan Hai Lines0.8 %
Blue World Line vs Wan Hai Lines: the verdict
Here is how Blue World Line and Wan Hai Lines compare across the metrics that matter most.
Frequently asked questions
Where are Blue World Line and Wan Hai Lines headquartered?▼
Blue World Line is headquartered in Atlanta, United States, while Wan Hai Lines is based in Taipei, Taiwan.
Related comparisons
Other Blue World Line comparisons
Explore each carrier in detail
Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.
Safecube
Container tracking
Track your containers across 200+ carriers
Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.