Skip to main content

Korea Marine Transport Company vs Mediterranean Shipping Company

Side-by-side comparison of Korea Marine Transport Company and Mediterranean Shipping Company across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

Korea Marine Transport Company logo

Korea Marine Transport Company

Headquarters
Seoul, Republic of Korea
Founded
1954
Alliance
—
vs
Mediterranean Shipping Company logo

Mediterranean Shipping Company

Headquarters
Geneva, Switzerland
Founded
1970
Alliance
Independent (former 2M)

At a glance

  • Fleet size:Mediterranean Shipping Company
  • Container fleet capacity:Mediterranean Shipping Company
  • Ports covered:Mediterranean Shipping Company
  • Annual revenue:Mediterranean Shipping Company

Korea Marine Transport Company vs Mediterranean Shipping Company: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
Korea Marine Transport Company
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Fleet size
65 ships
880 ships
Container fleet capacity
0.155 M TEU
6.3 M TEU
Volume transported
2.78 M TEU
24.5 M TEU
Owned terminals
—
48

Global presence

Metric
Korea Marine Transport Company
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Ports covered
81
520
Maritime lines
90
300
Countries of presence
25
155

Environmental impact

Metric
Korea Marine Transport Company
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
—
42.1 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
—
33,046 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
—
366 kt
Major oil spills
—
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
—
4 %

Business profile

Metric
Korea Marine Transport Company
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Annual revenue
2.494 B$
91.1 B$
Alliance
—
Independent (former 2M)
Year established
1954
1970

Safety

Metric
Korea Marine Transport Company
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Worker fatalities
—
5
Lost-time injury frequency
—
2.89
Training per employee
—
23 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

Korea Marine Transport Company and Mediterranean Shipping Company are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

Korea Marine Transport Company—
Mediterranean Shipping Company42.1 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

Korea Marine Transport Company—
Mediterranean Shipping Company33,046 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

Korea Marine Transport Company—
Mediterranean Shipping Company366 kt

Major oil spills

Korea Marine Transport Company—
Mediterranean Shipping Company0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

Korea Marine Transport Company—
Mediterranean Shipping Company4 %

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

Korea Marine Transport Company

—

Mediterranean Shipping Company

602
Ships
12.24
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions →

Korea Marine Transport Company vs Mediterranean Shipping Company: the verdict

Here is how Korea Marine Transport Company and Mediterranean Shipping Company compare across the metrics that matter most. Mediterranean Shipping Company operates the larger fleet. Mediterranean Shipping Company offers the wider port coverage.

Frequently asked questions

Is Korea Marine Transport Company or Mediterranean Shipping Company the bigger carrier?▼

Mediterranean Shipping Company operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which carrier has wider coverage, Korea Marine Transport Company or Mediterranean Shipping Company?▼

Mediterranean Shipping Company calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are Korea Marine Transport Company and Mediterranean Shipping Company headquartered?▼

Korea Marine Transport Company is headquartered in Seoul, Republic of Korea, while Mediterranean Shipping Company is based in Geneva, Switzerland.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)