Skip to main content

Korea Marine Transport Compagny vs Mediterranean Shipping Compagny

Side-by-side comparison of Korea Marine Transport Compagny and Mediterranean Shipping Compagny across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

Korea Marine Transport Compagny logo

Korea Marine Transport Compagny

Headquarters
Seoul, Republic of Korea
Founded
1954
Alliance
vs
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny logo

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny

Headquarters
Geneva, Switzerland
Founded
1970
Alliance
Independent (former 2M)

At a glance

  • Fleet size:Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
  • Container fleet capacity:Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
  • Ports covered:Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
  • Annual revenue:Mediterranean Shipping Compagny

Korea Marine Transport Compagny vs Mediterranean Shipping Compagny: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
Korea Marine Transport Compagny
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
Fleet size
65 ships
880 ships
Container fleet capacity
0.155 M TEU
6.3 M TEU
Volume transported
2.78 M TEU
24.5 M TEU
Owned terminals
48

Global presence

Metric
Korea Marine Transport Compagny
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
Ports covered
81
520
Maritime lines
90
300
Countries of presence
25
155

Environmental impact

Metric
Korea Marine Transport Compagny
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
42.1 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
33,046 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
366 kt
Major oil spills
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
4 %

Business profile

Metric
Korea Marine Transport Compagny
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
Annual revenue
2.494 B$
91.1 B$
Alliance
Independent (former 2M)
Year established
1954
1970

Safety

Metric
Korea Marine Transport Compagny
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
Worker fatalities
5
Lost-time injury frequency
2.89
Training per employee
23 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

Korea Marine Transport Compagny and Mediterranean Shipping Compagny are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

Korea Marine Transport Compagny
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny42.1 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

Korea Marine Transport Compagny
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny33,046 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

Korea Marine Transport Compagny
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny366 kt

Major oil spills

Korea Marine Transport Compagny
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

Korea Marine Transport Compagny
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny4 %

Korea Marine Transport Compagny vs Mediterranean Shipping Compagny: the verdict

Here is how Korea Marine Transport Compagny and Mediterranean Shipping Compagny compare across the metrics that matter most. Mediterranean Shipping Compagny operates the larger fleet. Mediterranean Shipping Compagny offers the wider port coverage.

Frequently asked questions

Is Korea Marine Transport Compagny or Mediterranean Shipping Compagny the bigger carrier?

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which carrier has wider coverage, Korea Marine Transport Compagny or Mediterranean Shipping Compagny?

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are Korea Marine Transport Compagny and Mediterranean Shipping Compagny headquartered?

Korea Marine Transport Compagny is headquartered in Seoul, Republic of Korea, while Mediterranean Shipping Compagny is based in Geneva, Switzerland.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)