Amass Global Network Group Co. vs Pacific International Lines
Side-by-side comparison of Amass Global Network Group Co. and Pacific International Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.
Amass Global Network Group Co.
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Founded
- 2004
- Alliance
- —
vs
Pacific International Lines
- Headquarters
- Singapore, Singapore
- Founded
- 1967
- Alliance
- —
At a glance
- Fleet size:Pacific International Lines
- Ports covered:Amass Global Network Group Co.
Ranking positions
Amass Global Network Group Co.
Amass Global Network Group Co. vs Pacific International Lines: full comparison
Fleet & capacity
Metric
Amass Global Network Group Co.
Pacific International Lines
Fleet size
0 ships
101 ships
Container fleet capacity
—
0.4 M TEU
Volume transported
—
2.5 M TEU
Owned terminals
—
20
Global presence
Metric
Amass Global Network Group Co.
Pacific International Lines
Ports covered
174
95
Maritime lines
20,000
67
Countries of presence
200
90
Environmental impact
Metric
Amass Global Network Group Co.
Pacific International Lines
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
—
2,881 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
—
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
—
1.9 %
Business profile
Metric
Amass Global Network Group Co.
Pacific International Lines
Annual revenue
—
2.9 B$
Alliance
—
Independent
Year established
2004
1,967
Safety
Metric
Amass Global Network Group Co.
Pacific International Lines
Worker fatalities
—
0
Lost-time injury frequency
—
0.71
Training per employee
—
37.9 h/yr
Environmental deep dive
Amass Global Network Group Co. and Pacific International Lines are evenly matched on environmental performance.
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
Amass Global Network Group Co.—
Pacific International Lines2,881 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
Amass Global Network Group Co.—
Pacific International Lines0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
Amass Global Network Group Co.—
Pacific International Lines1.9 %
Amass Global Network Group Co. vs Pacific International Lines: the verdict
Here is how Amass Global Network Group Co. and Pacific International Lines compare across the metrics that matter most. Pacific International Lines operates the larger fleet. Amass Global Network Group Co. offers the wider port coverage.
Frequently asked questions
Is Amass Global Network Group Co. or Pacific International Lines the bigger carrier?▼
Pacific International Lines operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.
Which carrier has wider coverage, Amass Global Network Group Co. or Pacific International Lines?▼
Amass Global Network Group Co. calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.
Where are Amass Global Network Group Co. and Pacific International Lines headquartered?▼
Amass Global Network Group Co. is headquartered in Shanghai, China, while Pacific International Lines is based in Singapore, Singapore.
Related comparisons
Other Amass Global Network Group Co. comparisons
Amass Global Network Group Co. vs A.P. Moller - MaerskAmass Global Network Group Co. vs Mediterranean Shipping CompagnyAmass Global Network Group Co. vs Wan Hai LinesAmass Global Network Group Co. vs ZIM Integrated ShippingAmass Global Network Group Co. vs Yang Ming LineAmass Global Network Group Co. vs Evergreen marine Corporation OR Evergreen Line
Other Pacific International Lines comparisons
Pacific International Lines vs A.P. Moller - MaerskPacific International Lines vs Mediterranean Shipping CompagnyPacific International Lines vs Wan Hai LinesPacific International Lines vs ZIM Integrated ShippingPacific International Lines vs Yang Ming LinePacific International Lines vs Evergreen marine Corporation OR Evergreen Line
Explore each carrier in detail
Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.
Safecube
Container tracking
Track your containers across 200+ carriers
Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.