Skip to main content

Blue Water Lines vs Mediterranean Shipping Company

Side-by-side comparison of Blue Water Lines and Mediterranean Shipping Company across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

Blue Water Lines logo

Blue Water Lines

Headquarters
Singapore, Singapore
Founded
2008
Alliance
—
vs
Mediterranean Shipping Company logo

Mediterranean Shipping Company

Headquarters
Geneva, Switzerland
Founded
1970
Alliance
Independent (former 2M)

At a glance

  • Ports covered:Mediterranean Shipping Company

Blue Water Lines vs Mediterranean Shipping Company: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
Blue Water Lines
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Fleet size
—
880 ships
Container fleet capacity
—
6.3 M TEU
Volume transported
—
24.5 M TEU
Owned terminals
—
48

Global presence

Metric
Blue Water Lines
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Ports covered
20
520
Maritime lines
—
300
Countries of presence
17
155

Environmental impact

Metric
Blue Water Lines
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
—
42.1 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
—
33,046 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
—
366 kt
Major oil spills
—
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
—
4 %

Business profile

Metric
Blue Water Lines
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Annual revenue
—
91.1 B$
Alliance
—
Independent (former 2M)
Year established
2008
1970

Safety

Metric
Blue Water Lines
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Worker fatalities
—
5
Lost-time injury frequency
—
2.89
Training per employee
—
23 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

Blue Water Lines and Mediterranean Shipping Company are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

Blue Water Lines—
Mediterranean Shipping Company42.1 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

Blue Water Lines—
Mediterranean Shipping Company33,046 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

Blue Water Lines—
Mediterranean Shipping Company366 kt

Major oil spills

Blue Water Lines—
Mediterranean Shipping Company0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

Blue Water Lines—
Mediterranean Shipping Company4 %

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

Blue Water Lines

—

Mediterranean Shipping Company

602
Ships
12.24
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions →

Blue Water Lines vs Mediterranean Shipping Company: the verdict

Here is how Blue Water Lines and Mediterranean Shipping Company compare across the metrics that matter most. Mediterranean Shipping Company offers the wider port coverage.

Frequently asked questions

Which carrier has wider coverage, Blue Water Lines or Mediterranean Shipping Company?▼

Mediterranean Shipping Company calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are Blue Water Lines and Mediterranean Shipping Company headquartered?▼

Blue Water Lines is headquartered in Singapore, Singapore, while Mediterranean Shipping Company is based in Geneva, Switzerland.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)