Skip to main content

Blue Water Lines vs A.P. Moller - Maersk

Side-by-side comparison of Blue Water Lines and A.P. Moller - Maersk across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

Blue Water Lines logo

Blue Water Lines

Headquarters
Singapore, Singapore
Founded
2008
Alliance
—
vs
A.P. Moller - Maersk logo

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Headquarters
Copenhagen, Denmark
Founded
1904
Alliance
Gemini Cooperation

At a glance

  • Ports covered:A.P. Moller - Maersk

Blue Water Lines vs A.P. Moller - Maersk: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
Blue Water Lines
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Fleet size
—
715 ships
Container fleet capacity
—
4.4 M TEU
Volume transported
—
11.9 M TEU
Owned terminals
—
74

Global presence

Metric
Blue Water Lines
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Ports covered
20
374
Maritime lines
—
330
Countries of presence
17
130

Environmental impact

Metric
Blue Water Lines
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
—
48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
—
34,168 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
—
533 kt
Major oil spills
—
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
—
1.1 %

Business profile

Metric
Blue Water Lines
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Annual revenue
—
51.1 B$
Alliance
—
Gemini Cooperation
Year established
2008
1904

Safety

Metric
Blue Water Lines
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Worker fatalities
—
4
Lost-time injury frequency
—
1.11

Environmental deep dive

Blue Water Lines and A.P. Moller - Maersk are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

Blue Water Lines—
A.P. Moller - Maersk48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

Blue Water Lines—
A.P. Moller - Maersk34,168 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

Blue Water Lines—
A.P. Moller - Maersk533 kt

Major oil spills

Blue Water Lines—
A.P. Moller - Maersk0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

Blue Water Lines—
A.P. Moller - Maersk1.1 %

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

Blue Water Lines

—

A.P. Moller - Maersk

197
Ships
6.68
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions →

Blue Water Lines vs A.P. Moller - Maersk: the verdict

Here is how Blue Water Lines and A.P. Moller - Maersk compare across the metrics that matter most. A.P. Moller - Maersk offers the wider port coverage.

Frequently asked questions

Which carrier has wider coverage, Blue Water Lines or A.P. Moller - Maersk?▼

A.P. Moller - Maersk calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are Blue Water Lines and A.P. Moller - Maersk headquartered?▼

Blue Water Lines is headquartered in Singapore, Singapore, while A.P. Moller - Maersk is based in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)