Skip to main content

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Yang Ming Line

Side-by-side comparison of A.P. Moller - Maersk and Yang Ming Line across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

A.P. Moller - Maersk logo

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Headquarters
Copenhagen, Denmark
Founded
1904
Alliance
Gemini Cooperation
vs
Yang Ming Line logo

Yang Ming Line

Headquarters
Keelung, Taiwan
Founded
1972
Alliance
Premier Alliance

At a glance

  • Fleet size:A.P. Moller - Maersk
  • Container fleet capacity:A.P. Moller - Maersk
  • Ports covered:A.P. Moller - Maersk
  • Carbon efficiency (EEDI):Yang Ming Line
  • Annual revenue:A.P. Moller - Maersk

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Yang Ming Line: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Yang Ming Line
Fleet size
715 ships
98 ships
Container fleet capacity
4.4 M TEU
0.72 M TEU
Volume transported
11.9 M TEU
4.58 M TEU
Owned terminals
74
5

Global presence

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Yang Ming Line
Ports covered
374
70
Maritime lines
330
90
Countries of presence
130
87

Environmental impact

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Yang Ming Line
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km
37.9 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
34,168 ktCO₂eq
4,294 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
533 kt
19,951 kt
Major oil spills
0
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
1.1 %
0 %

Business profile

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Yang Ming Line
Annual revenue
51.1 B$
4.6 B$
Alliance
Gemini Cooperation
Premier Alliance
Year established
1904
1972

Safety

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Yang Ming Line
Worker fatalities
4
0
Lost-time injury frequency
1.11
1.46
Training per employee
23 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

A.P. Moller - Maersk and Yang Ming Line are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

A.P. Moller - Maersk48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km
Yang Ming Line37.9 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

A.P. Moller - Maersk34,168 ktCO₂eq
Yang Ming Line4,294 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

A.P. Moller - Maersk533 kt
Yang Ming Line19,951 kt

Major oil spills

A.P. Moller - Maersk0
Yang Ming Line0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

A.P. Moller - Maersk1.1 %
Yang Ming Line0 %

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Yang Ming Line: the verdict

Here is how A.P. Moller - Maersk and Yang Ming Line compare across the metrics that matter most. A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet. A.P. Moller - Maersk offers the wider port coverage. Yang Ming Line is the more carbon-efficient carrier. A.P. Moller - Maersk sails with Gemini Cooperation, while Yang Ming Line belongs to Premier Alliance.

Frequently asked questions

Is A.P. Moller - Maersk or Yang Ming Line the bigger carrier?

A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which is greener, A.P. Moller - Maersk or Yang Ming Line?

Yang Ming Line is the more carbon-efficient carrier, with a lower EEDI across its fleet.

Which carrier has wider coverage, A.P. Moller - Maersk or Yang Ming Line?

A.P. Moller - Maersk calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are A.P. Moller - Maersk and Yang Ming Line headquartered?

A.P. Moller - Maersk is headquartered in Copenhagen, Denmark, while Yang Ming Line is based in Keelung, Taiwan.

Which alliances do A.P. Moller - Maersk and Yang Ming Line belong to?

A.P. Moller - Maersk is part of Gemini Cooperation, while Yang Ming Line sails with Premier Alliance.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)