Skip to main content

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs ZIM Integrated Shipping

Side-by-side comparison of A.P. Moller - Maersk and ZIM Integrated Shipping across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

A.P. Moller - Maersk logo

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Headquarters
Copenhagen, Denmark
Founded
1904
Alliance
Gemini Cooperation
vs
ZIM Integrated Shipping logo

ZIM Integrated Shipping

Headquarters
Haifa, Israel
Founded
1945
Alliance
Independent

At a glance

  • Fleet size:A.P. Moller - Maersk
  • Container fleet capacity:A.P. Moller - Maersk
  • Ports covered:A.P. Moller - Maersk
  • Carbon efficiency (EEDI):A.P. Moller - Maersk
  • Annual revenue:A.P. Moller - Maersk

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs ZIM Integrated Shipping: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Fleet size
715 ships
147 ships
Container fleet capacity
4.4 M TEU
0.78 M TEU
Volume transported
11.9 M TEU
3.36 M TEU
Owned terminals
74
0

Global presence

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Ports covered
374
335
Maritime lines
330
107
Countries of presence
130
90

Environmental impact

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km
63.6 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
34,168 ktCO₂eq
5,524 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
533 kt
Major oil spills
0
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
1.1 %
20 %

Business profile

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Annual revenue
51.1 B$
5.16 B$
Alliance
Gemini Cooperation
Independent
Year established
1904
1945

Safety

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Worker fatalities
4
0
Lost-time injury frequency
1.11
1.1

Environmental deep dive

ZIM Integrated Shipping has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

A.P. Moller - Maersk48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km
ZIM Integrated Shipping63.6 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

A.P. Moller - Maersk34,168 ktCO₂eq
ZIM Integrated Shipping5,524 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

A.P. Moller - Maersk533 kt
ZIM Integrated Shipping

Major oil spills

A.P. Moller - Maersk0
ZIM Integrated Shipping0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

A.P. Moller - Maersk1.1 %
ZIM Integrated Shipping20 %

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs ZIM Integrated Shipping: the verdict

Here is how A.P. Moller - Maersk and ZIM Integrated Shipping compare across the metrics that matter most. A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet. A.P. Moller - Maersk offers the wider port coverage. A.P. Moller - Maersk is the more carbon-efficient carrier. A.P. Moller - Maersk sails with Gemini Cooperation, while ZIM Integrated Shipping belongs to Independent.

Frequently asked questions

Is A.P. Moller - Maersk or ZIM Integrated Shipping the bigger carrier?

A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which is greener, A.P. Moller - Maersk or ZIM Integrated Shipping?

A.P. Moller - Maersk is the more carbon-efficient carrier, with a lower EEDI across its fleet.

Which carrier has wider coverage, A.P. Moller - Maersk or ZIM Integrated Shipping?

A.P. Moller - Maersk calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are A.P. Moller - Maersk and ZIM Integrated Shipping headquartered?

A.P. Moller - Maersk is headquartered in Copenhagen, Denmark, while ZIM Integrated Shipping is based in Haifa, Israel.

Which alliances do A.P. Moller - Maersk and ZIM Integrated Shipping belong to?

A.P. Moller - Maersk is part of Gemini Cooperation, while ZIM Integrated Shipping sails with Independent.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)