A.P. Moller - Maersk vs ZIM Integrated Shipping
Side-by-side comparison of A.P. Moller - Maersk and ZIM Integrated Shipping across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.
A.P. Moller - Maersk
- Headquarters
- Copenhagen, Denmark
- Founded
- 1904
- Alliance
- —
vs
ZIM Integrated Shipping
- Headquarters
- Haifa, Israel
- Founded
- 1945
- Alliance
- —
At a glance
- Fleet size:A.P. Moller - Maersk
- Container fleet capacity:A.P. Moller - Maersk
- Ports covered:A.P. Moller - Maersk
- Annual revenue:A.P. Moller - Maersk
Ranking positions
A.P. Moller - Maersk
ZIM Integrated Shipping
A.P. Moller - Maersk vs ZIM Integrated Shipping: full comparison
Fleet & capacity
Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Fleet size
715 ships
147 ships
Container fleet capacity
4.3 M TEU
0.8 M TEU
Volume transported
12.1 M TEU
3.6 M TEU
Owned terminals
74
0
Global presence
Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Ports covered
374
335
Maritime lines
330
107
Countries of presence
130
90
Environmental impact
Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km
—
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
34,168 ktCO₂eq
5,524 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
533 kt
—
Major oil spills
0
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
1.1 %
20 %
Business profile
Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Annual revenue
51.1 B$
5.16 B$
Alliance
Gemini Cooperation
Independent
Year established
1,904
1,945
Safety
Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Worker fatalities
4
0
Lost-time injury frequency
1.11
1.1
Environmental deep dive
ZIM Integrated Shipping has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
A.P. Moller - Maersk48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km
ZIM Integrated Shipping—
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
A.P. Moller - Maersk34,168 ktCO₂eq
ZIM Integrated Shipping5,524 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
A.P. Moller - Maersk533 kt
ZIM Integrated Shipping—
Major oil spills
A.P. Moller - Maersk0
ZIM Integrated Shipping0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
A.P. Moller - Maersk1.1 %
ZIM Integrated Shipping20 %
A.P. Moller - Maersk vs ZIM Integrated Shipping: the verdict
Here is how A.P. Moller - Maersk and ZIM Integrated Shipping compare across the metrics that matter most. A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet. A.P. Moller - Maersk offers the wider port coverage.
Frequently asked questions
Is A.P. Moller - Maersk or ZIM Integrated Shipping the bigger carrier?▼
A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.
Which carrier has wider coverage, A.P. Moller - Maersk or ZIM Integrated Shipping?▼
A.P. Moller - Maersk calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.
Where are A.P. Moller - Maersk and ZIM Integrated Shipping headquartered?▼
A.P. Moller - Maersk is headquartered in Copenhagen, Denmark, while ZIM Integrated Shipping is based in Haifa, Israel.
Related comparisons
Other A.P. Moller - Maersk comparisons
Other ZIM Integrated Shipping comparisons
ZIM Integrated Shipping vs Mediterranean Shipping CompagnyZIM Integrated Shipping vs Pacific International LinesZIM Integrated Shipping vs Wan Hai LinesZIM Integrated Shipping vs Yang Ming LineZIM Integrated Shipping vs Evergreen marine Corporation OR Evergreen LineZIM Integrated Shipping vs Ocean Network Express
Explore each carrier in detail
Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.
Safecube
Container tracking
Track your containers across 200+ carriers
Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.