Skip to main content

Camellia Line vs Pacific International Lines

Side-by-side comparison of Camellia Line and Pacific International Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

Camellia Line logo

Camellia Line

Headquarters
Fukuoka City, Japan
Founded
1990
Alliance
—
vs
Pacific International Lines logo

Pacific International Lines

Headquarters
Singapore, Singapore
Founded
1967
Alliance
Independent

At a glance

  • Fleet size:Pacific International Lines
  • Ports covered:Pacific International Lines
  • Annual revenue:Pacific International Lines

Camellia Line vs Pacific International Lines: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
Camellia Line
Pacific International Lines
Fleet size
2 ships
101 ships
Container fleet capacity
—
0.389 M TEU
Volume transported
—
2.5 M TEU
Owned terminals
—
20

Global presence

Metric
Camellia Line
Pacific International Lines
Ports covered
2
95
Maritime lines
1
67
Countries of presence
2
90

Environmental impact

Metric
Camellia Line
Pacific International Lines
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
—
2,881 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
—
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
—
1.9 %

Business profile

Metric
Camellia Line
Pacific International Lines
Annual revenue
1.2 B$
2.9 B$
Alliance
—
Independent
Year established
1990
1967

Safety

Metric
Camellia Line
Pacific International Lines
Worker fatalities
—
0
Lost-time injury frequency
—
0.71
Training per employee
—
37.9 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

Camellia Line and Pacific International Lines are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

Camellia Line—
Pacific International Lines2,881 ktCO₂eq

Major oil spills

Camellia Line—
Pacific International Lines0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

Camellia Line—
Pacific International Lines1.9 %

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

Camellia Line

—

Pacific International Lines

9
Ships
0.01
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions →

Camellia Line vs Pacific International Lines: the verdict

Here is how Camellia Line and Pacific International Lines compare across the metrics that matter most. Pacific International Lines operates the larger fleet. Pacific International Lines offers the wider port coverage.

Frequently asked questions

Is Camellia Line or Pacific International Lines the bigger carrier?▼

Pacific International Lines operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which carrier has wider coverage, Camellia Line or Pacific International Lines?▼

Pacific International Lines calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are Camellia Line and Pacific International Lines headquartered?▼

Camellia Line is headquartered in Fukuoka City, Japan, while Pacific International Lines is based in Singapore, Singapore.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)