Skip to main content

CMA CGM Group vs Pacific International Lines

Side-by-side comparison of CMA CGM Group and Pacific International Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

CMA CGM Group logo

CMA CGM Group

Headquarters
Marseille, France
Founded
1978
Alliance
Ocean Alliance
vs
Pacific International Lines logo

Pacific International Lines

Headquarters
Singapore, Singapore
Founded
1967
Alliance
Independent

At a glance

  • Fleet size:CMA CGM Group
  • Container fleet capacity:CMA CGM Group
  • Ports covered:CMA CGM Group
  • Annual revenue:CMA CGM Group

CMA CGM Group vs Pacific International Lines: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
CMA CGM Group
Pacific International Lines
Fleet size
658 ships
101 ships
Container fleet capacity
5 M TEU
0.389 M TEU
Volume transported
22 M TEU
2.5 M TEU
Owned terminals
21
20

Global presence

Metric
CMA CGM Group
Pacific International Lines
Ports covered
420
95
Maritime lines
257
67
Countries of presence
160
90

Environmental impact

Metric
CMA CGM Group
Pacific International Lines
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
44.5 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
25.4 ktCO₂eq
2,881 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
0
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
5.6 %
1.9 %

Business profile

Metric
CMA CGM Group
Pacific International Lines
Annual revenue
74.5 B$
2.9 B$
Alliance
Ocean Alliance
Independent
Year established
1978
1967

Safety

Metric
CMA CGM Group
Pacific International Lines
Worker fatalities
2
0
Lost-time injury frequency
0.77
0.71
Training per employee
37.9 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

CMA CGM Group has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

CMA CGM Group44.5 gCO₂/TEU·km
Pacific International Lines

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

CMA CGM Group25.4 ktCO₂eq
Pacific International Lines2,881 ktCO₂eq

Major oil spills

CMA CGM Group0
Pacific International Lines0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

CMA CGM Group5.6 %
Pacific International Lines1.9 %

CMA CGM Group vs Pacific International Lines: the verdict

Here is how CMA CGM Group and Pacific International Lines compare across the metrics that matter most. CMA CGM Group operates the larger fleet. CMA CGM Group offers the wider port coverage. CMA CGM Group sails with Ocean Alliance, while Pacific International Lines belongs to Independent.

Frequently asked questions

Is CMA CGM Group or Pacific International Lines the bigger carrier?

CMA CGM Group operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which carrier has wider coverage, CMA CGM Group or Pacific International Lines?

CMA CGM Group calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are CMA CGM Group and Pacific International Lines headquartered?

CMA CGM Group is headquartered in Marseille, France, while Pacific International Lines is based in Singapore, Singapore.

Which alliances do CMA CGM Group and Pacific International Lines belong to?

CMA CGM Group is part of Ocean Alliance, while Pacific International Lines sails with Independent.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)