Skip to main content

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) vs ZIM Integrated Shipping

Side-by-side comparison of Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) and ZIM Integrated Shipping across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) logo

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line)

Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Founded
1919
Alliance
Independent (ONE member for container)
vs
ZIM Integrated Shipping logo

ZIM Integrated Shipping

Headquarters
Haifa, Israel
Founded
1945
Alliance
Independent

At a glance

  • Fleet size:Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line)
  • Ports covered:ZIM Integrated Shipping
  • Annual revenue:Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line)

Ranking positions

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line)

ZIM Integrated Shipping

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) vs ZIM Integrated Shipping: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line)
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Fleet size
400 ships
147 ships
Container fleet capacity
0.78 M TEU
Volume transported
3.36 M TEU
Owned terminals
0

Global presence

Metric
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line)
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Ports covered
200
335
Maritime lines
80
107
Countries of presence
90

Environmental impact

Metric
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line)
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
63.6 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
5,524 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
20 %

Business profile

Metric
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line)
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Annual revenue
7.5 B$
5.16 B$
Alliance
Independent (ONE member for container)
Independent
Year established
1919
1945

Safety

Metric
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line)
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Worker fatalities
0
Lost-time injury frequency
1.1

Environmental deep dive

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) and ZIM Integrated Shipping are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line)
ZIM Integrated Shipping63.6 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line)
ZIM Integrated Shipping5,524 ktCO₂eq

Major oil spills

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line)
ZIM Integrated Shipping0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line)
ZIM Integrated Shipping20 %

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line)

ZIM Integrated Shipping

8
Ships
0.18
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) vs ZIM Integrated Shipping: the verdict

Here is how Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) and ZIM Integrated Shipping compare across the metrics that matter most. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) operates the larger fleet. ZIM Integrated Shipping offers the wider port coverage. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) sails with Independent (ONE member for container), while ZIM Integrated Shipping belongs to Independent.

Frequently asked questions

Is Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) or ZIM Integrated Shipping the bigger carrier?

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which carrier has wider coverage, Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) or ZIM Integrated Shipping?

ZIM Integrated Shipping calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) and ZIM Integrated Shipping headquartered?

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan, while ZIM Integrated Shipping is based in Haifa, Israel.

Which alliances do Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) and ZIM Integrated Shipping belong to?

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line) is part of Independent (ONE member for container), while ZIM Integrated Shipping sails with Independent.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)