Matson vs Pacific International Lines
Side-by-side comparison of Matson and Pacific International Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.
Matson
- Headquarters
- Honolulu, United States
- Founded
- 1882
- Alliance
- —
Pacific International Lines
- Headquarters
- Singapore, Singapore
- Founded
- 1967
- Alliance
- Independent
At a glance
- Fleet size:Pacific International Lines
- Container fleet capacity:Pacific International Lines
- Ports covered:Pacific International Lines
- Annual revenue:Matson
Matson vs Pacific International Lines: full comparison
Fleet & capacity
Global presence
Environmental impact
Business profile
Safety
Environmental deep dive
Matson has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
Major oil spills
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
Matson vs Pacific International Lines: the verdict
Here is how Matson and Pacific International Lines compare across the metrics that matter most. Pacific International Lines operates the larger fleet. Pacific International Lines offers the wider port coverage.
Frequently asked questions
Is Matson or Pacific International Lines the bigger carrier?▼
Pacific International Lines operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.
Which carrier has wider coverage, Matson or Pacific International Lines?▼
Pacific International Lines calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.
Where are Matson and Pacific International Lines headquartered?▼
Matson is headquartered in Honolulu, United States, while Pacific International Lines is based in Singapore, Singapore.
Related comparisons
Other Matson comparisons
Other Pacific International Lines comparisons
Explore each carrier in detail
Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.
Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.