Skip to main content

Maxicon Container Line vs Pacific International Lines

Side-by-side comparison of Maxicon Container Line and Pacific International Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

Maxicon Container Line logo

Maxicon Container Line

Headquarters
Singapore, Singapore
Founded
2003
Alliance
—
vs
Pacific International Lines logo

Pacific International Lines

Headquarters
Singapore, Singapore
Founded
1967
Alliance
Independent

At a glance

  • Fleet size:Pacific International Lines
  • Ports covered:Pacific International Lines

Maxicon Container Line vs Pacific International Lines: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
Maxicon Container Line
Pacific International Lines
Fleet size
0 ships
101 ships
Container fleet capacity
—
0.389 M TEU
Volume transported
—
2.5 M TEU
Owned terminals
—
20

Global presence

Metric
Maxicon Container Line
Pacific International Lines
Ports covered
73
95
Maritime lines
—
67
Countries of presence
—
90

Environmental impact

Metric
Maxicon Container Line
Pacific International Lines
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
—
2,881 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
—
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
—
1.9 %

Business profile

Metric
Maxicon Container Line
Pacific International Lines
Annual revenue
—
2.9 B$
Alliance
—
Independent
Year established
2003
1967

Safety

Metric
Maxicon Container Line
Pacific International Lines
Worker fatalities
—
0
Lost-time injury frequency
—
0.71
Training per employee
—
37.9 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

Maxicon Container Line and Pacific International Lines are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

Maxicon Container Line—
Pacific International Lines2,881 ktCO₂eq

Major oil spills

Maxicon Container Line—
Pacific International Lines0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

Maxicon Container Line—
Pacific International Lines1.9 %

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

Maxicon Container Line

—

Pacific International Lines

9
Ships
0.01
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions →

Maxicon Container Line vs Pacific International Lines: the verdict

Here is how Maxicon Container Line and Pacific International Lines compare across the metrics that matter most. Pacific International Lines operates the larger fleet. Pacific International Lines offers the wider port coverage.

Frequently asked questions

Is Maxicon Container Line or Pacific International Lines the bigger carrier?▼

Pacific International Lines operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which carrier has wider coverage, Maxicon Container Line or Pacific International Lines?▼

Pacific International Lines calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are Maxicon Container Line and Pacific International Lines headquartered?▼

Maxicon Container Line is headquartered in Singapore, Singapore, while Pacific International Lines is based in Singapore, Singapore.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)