Skip to main content

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny vs X-Press Container Line

Side-by-side comparison of Mediterranean Shipping Compagny and X-Press Container Line across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny logo

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny

Headquarters
Geneva, Switzerland
Founded
1970
Alliance
Independent (former 2M)
vs
X-Press Container Line logo

X-Press Container Line

Headquarters
Singapore, Singapore
Founded
1972
Alliance

At a glance

  • Fleet size:Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
  • Container fleet capacity:Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
  • Carbon efficiency (EEDI):X-Press Container Line
  • Annual revenue:Mediterranean Shipping Compagny

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny vs X-Press Container Line: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
X-Press Container Line
Fleet size
880 ships
95 ships
Container fleet capacity
6.3 M TEU
0.179 M TEU
Volume transported
24.5 M TEU
Owned terminals
48

Global presence

Metric
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
X-Press Container Line
Ports covered
520
Maritime lines
300
100
Countries of presence
155
8

Environmental impact

Metric
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
X-Press Container Line
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
42.1 gCO₂/TEU·km
25.98 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
33,046 ktCO₂eq
1,562 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
366 kt
Major oil spills
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
4 %

Business profile

Metric
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
X-Press Container Line
Annual revenue
91.1 B$
1.1 B$
Alliance
Independent (former 2M)
Year established
1970
1972

Safety

Metric
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny
X-Press Container Line
Worker fatalities
5
0
Lost-time injury frequency
2.89
Training per employee
23 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

X-Press Container Line has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny42.1 gCO₂/TEU·km
X-Press Container Line25.98 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny33,046 ktCO₂eq
X-Press Container Line1,562 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny366 kt
X-Press Container Line

Major oil spills

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny0
X-Press Container Line

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny4 %
X-Press Container Line

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny

602
Ships
12.24
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions

X-Press Container Line

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny vs X-Press Container Line: the verdict

Here is how Mediterranean Shipping Compagny and X-Press Container Line compare across the metrics that matter most. Mediterranean Shipping Compagny operates the larger fleet. X-Press Container Line is the more carbon-efficient carrier.

Frequently asked questions

Is Mediterranean Shipping Compagny or X-Press Container Line the bigger carrier?

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which is greener, Mediterranean Shipping Compagny or X-Press Container Line?

X-Press Container Line is the more carbon-efficient carrier, with a lower EEDI across its fleet.

Where are Mediterranean Shipping Compagny and X-Press Container Line headquartered?

Mediterranean Shipping Compagny is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, while X-Press Container Line is based in Singapore, Singapore.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)