Skip to main content

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs X-Press Container Line

Side-by-side comparison of A.P. Moller - Maersk and X-Press Container Line across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

A.P. Moller - Maersk logo

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Headquarters
Copenhagen, Denmark
Founded
1904
Alliance
Gemini Cooperation
vs
X-Press Container Line logo

X-Press Container Line

Headquarters
Singapore, Singapore
Founded
1972
Alliance
—

At a glance

  • Fleet size:A.P. Moller - Maersk
  • Container fleet capacity:A.P. Moller - Maersk
  • Carbon efficiency (EEDI):X-Press Container Line
  • Annual revenue:A.P. Moller - Maersk

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs X-Press Container Line: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
X-Press Container Line
Fleet size
715 ships
95 ships
Container fleet capacity
4.4 M TEU
0.179 M TEU
Volume transported
11.9 M TEU
—
Owned terminals
74
—

Global presence

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
X-Press Container Line
Ports covered
374
—
Maritime lines
330
100
Countries of presence
130
8

Environmental impact

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
X-Press Container Line
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km
25.98 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
34,168 ktCO₂eq
1,562 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
533 kt
—
Major oil spills
0
—
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
1.1 %
—

Business profile

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
X-Press Container Line
Annual revenue
51.1 B$
1.1 B$
Alliance
Gemini Cooperation
—
Year established
1904
1972

Safety

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
X-Press Container Line
Worker fatalities
4
0
Lost-time injury frequency
1.11
—

Environmental deep dive

X-Press Container Line has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

A.P. Moller - Maersk48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km
X-Press Container Line25.98 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

A.P. Moller - Maersk34,168 ktCO₂eq
X-Press Container Line1,562 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

A.P. Moller - Maersk533 kt
X-Press Container Line—

Major oil spills

A.P. Moller - Maersk0
X-Press Container Line—

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

A.P. Moller - Maersk1.1 %
X-Press Container Line—

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

A.P. Moller - Maersk

197
Ships
6.68
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions →

X-Press Container Line

—

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs X-Press Container Line: the verdict

Here is how A.P. Moller - Maersk and X-Press Container Line compare across the metrics that matter most. A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet. X-Press Container Line is the more carbon-efficient carrier.

Frequently asked questions

Is A.P. Moller - Maersk or X-Press Container Line the bigger carrier?▼

A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which is greener, A.P. Moller - Maersk or X-Press Container Line?▼

X-Press Container Line is the more carbon-efficient carrier, with a lower EEDI across its fleet.

Where are A.P. Moller - Maersk and X-Press Container Line headquartered?▼

A.P. Moller - Maersk is headquartered in Copenhagen, Denmark, while X-Press Container Line is based in Singapore, Singapore.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)