Route Planner vs Wan Hai Lines
Side-by-side comparison of Route Planner and Wan Hai Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.
Route Planner
- Headquarters
- —
- Founded
- —
- Alliance
- —
vs
Wan Hai Lines
- Headquarters
- Taipei, Taiwan
- Founded
- 1965
- Alliance
- Independent
Route Planner vs Wan Hai Lines: full comparison
Fleet & capacity
Metric
Route Planner
Wan Hai Lines
Fleet size
—
124 ships
Container fleet capacity
—
0.496 M TEU
Volume transported
—
2.8 M TEU
Owned terminals
—
7
Storage volume
—
239,000 m²
Global presence
Metric
Route Planner
Wan Hai Lines
Ports covered
—
85
Maritime lines
—
55
Countries of presence
—
33
Environmental impact
Metric
Route Planner
Wan Hai Lines
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
—
57.18 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
—
4,449 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
—
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
—
0.8 %
Business profile
Metric
Route Planner
Wan Hai Lines
Annual revenue
—
3.04 B$
Alliance
—
Independent
Year established
—
1965
Safety
Metric
Route Planner
Wan Hai Lines
Worker fatalities
—
0
Lost-time injury frequency
—
5.84
Environmental deep dive
Route Planner and Wan Hai Lines are evenly matched on environmental performance.
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
Route Planner—
Wan Hai Lines57.18 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
Route Planner—
Wan Hai Lines4,449 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
Route Planner—
Wan Hai Lines0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
Route Planner—
Wan Hai Lines0.8 %
Route Planner vs Wan Hai Lines: the verdict
Here is how Route Planner and Wan Hai Lines compare across the metrics that matter most.
Related comparisons
Other Route Planner comparisons
Explore each carrier in detail
Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.
Safecube
Container tracking
Track your containers across 200+ carriers
Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.