Skip to main content

Route Planner vs Yang Ming Line

Side-by-side comparison of Route Planner and Yang Ming Line across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

Route Planner logo

Route Planner

Headquarters
Founded
Alliance
vs
Yang Ming Line logo

Yang Ming Line

Headquarters
Keelung, Taiwan
Founded
1972
Alliance
Premier Alliance

Route Planner vs Yang Ming Line: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
Route Planner
Yang Ming Line
Fleet size
98 ships
Container fleet capacity
0.72 M TEU
Volume transported
4.58 M TEU
Owned terminals
5

Global presence

Metric
Route Planner
Yang Ming Line
Ports covered
70
Maritime lines
90
Countries of presence
87

Environmental impact

Metric
Route Planner
Yang Ming Line
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
37.9 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
4,294 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
19,951 kt
Major oil spills
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
0 %

Business profile

Metric
Route Planner
Yang Ming Line
Annual revenue
4.6 B$
Alliance
Premier Alliance
Year established
1972

Safety

Metric
Route Planner
Yang Ming Line
Worker fatalities
0
Lost-time injury frequency
1.46
Training per employee
23 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

Route Planner and Yang Ming Line are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

Route Planner
Yang Ming Line37.9 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

Route Planner
Yang Ming Line4,294 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

Route Planner
Yang Ming Line19,951 kt

Major oil spills

Route Planner
Yang Ming Line0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

Route Planner
Yang Ming Line0 %

Route Planner vs Yang Ming Line: the verdict

Here is how Route Planner and Yang Ming Line compare across the metrics that matter most.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)