Skip to main content

BAL Container Line vs A.P. Moller - Maersk

Side-by-side comparison of BAL Container Line and A.P. Moller - Maersk across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

BAL Container Line logo

BAL Container Line

Headquarters
Hong Kong, China
Founded
2012
Alliance
—
vs
A.P. Moller - Maersk logo

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Headquarters
Copenhagen, Denmark
Founded
1904
Alliance
Gemini Cooperation

At a glance

  • Fleet size:A.P. Moller - Maersk

BAL Container Line vs A.P. Moller - Maersk: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
BAL Container Line
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Fleet size
0 ships
715 ships
Container fleet capacity
—
4.4 M TEU
Volume transported
—
11.9 M TEU
Owned terminals
—
74

Global presence

Metric
BAL Container Line
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Ports covered
—
374
Maritime lines
—
330
Countries of presence
—
130

Environmental impact

Metric
BAL Container Line
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
—
48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
—
34,168 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
—
533 kt
Major oil spills
—
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
—
1.1 %

Business profile

Metric
BAL Container Line
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Annual revenue
—
51.1 B$
Alliance
—
Gemini Cooperation
Year established
2012
1904

Safety

Metric
BAL Container Line
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Worker fatalities
—
4
Lost-time injury frequency
—
1.11

Environmental deep dive

BAL Container Line and A.P. Moller - Maersk are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

BAL Container Line—
A.P. Moller - Maersk48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

BAL Container Line—
A.P. Moller - Maersk34,168 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

BAL Container Line—
A.P. Moller - Maersk533 kt

Major oil spills

BAL Container Line—
A.P. Moller - Maersk0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

BAL Container Line—
A.P. Moller - Maersk1.1 %

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

BAL Container Line

—

A.P. Moller - Maersk

197
Ships
6.68
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions →

BAL Container Line vs A.P. Moller - Maersk: the verdict

Here is how BAL Container Line and A.P. Moller - Maersk compare across the metrics that matter most. A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet.

Frequently asked questions

Is BAL Container Line or A.P. Moller - Maersk the bigger carrier?▼

A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Where are BAL Container Line and A.P. Moller - Maersk headquartered?▼

BAL Container Line is headquartered in Hong Kong, China, while A.P. Moller - Maersk is based in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)