Side-by-side comparison of COSCO Shipping and Hapag-Lloyd across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.


Hapag-Lloyd has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
Major oil spills
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
32 published rates
28 published rates
Here is how COSCO Shipping and Hapag-Lloyd compare across the metrics that matter most. COSCO Shipping operates the larger fleet. COSCO Shipping offers the wider port coverage. Hapag-Lloyd is the more carbon-efficient carrier.
COSCO Shipping operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.
Hapag-Lloyd is the more carbon-efficient carrier, with a lower EEDI across its fleet.
COSCO Shipping calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.
COSCO Shipping is headquartered in Shanghai, China, while Hapag-Lloyd is based in Hamburg, Germany.
Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.
Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.