Skip to main content

COSCO Shipping vs ZIM Integrated Shipping

Side-by-side comparison of COSCO Shipping and ZIM Integrated Shipping across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

COSCO Shipping logo

COSCO Shipping

Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Founded
1961
Alliance
Ocean Alliance
vs
ZIM Integrated Shipping logo

ZIM Integrated Shipping

Headquarters
Haifa, Israel
Founded
1945
Alliance
Independent

At a glance

  • Fleet size:COSCO Shipping
  • Container fleet capacity:COSCO Shipping
  • Ports covered:COSCO Shipping
  • Carbon efficiency (EEDI):COSCO Shipping
  • Annual revenue:COSCO Shipping

COSCO Shipping vs ZIM Integrated Shipping: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
COSCO Shipping
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Fleet size
516 ships
147 ships
Container fleet capacity
3.3 M TEU
0.78 M TEU
Volume transported
21.5 M TEU
3.36 M TEU
Owned terminals
38
0

Global presence

Metric
COSCO Shipping
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Ports covered
606
335
Maritime lines
404
107
Countries of presence
144
90

Environmental impact

Metric
COSCO Shipping
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
46.8 gCO₂/TEU·km
63.6 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
16,655 ktCO₂eq
5,524 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
0
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
0 %
20 %

Business profile

Metric
COSCO Shipping
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Annual revenue
23.9 B$
5.16 B$
Alliance
Ocean Alliance
Independent
Year established
1961
1945

Safety

Metric
COSCO Shipping
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Worker fatalities
0
0
Lost-time injury frequency
1.1
Training per employee
32 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

ZIM Integrated Shipping has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

COSCO Shipping46.8 gCO₂/TEU·km
ZIM Integrated Shipping63.6 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

COSCO Shipping16,655 ktCO₂eq
ZIM Integrated Shipping5,524 ktCO₂eq

Major oil spills

COSCO Shipping0
ZIM Integrated Shipping0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

COSCO Shipping0 %
ZIM Integrated Shipping20 %

COSCO Shipping vs ZIM Integrated Shipping: the verdict

Here is how COSCO Shipping and ZIM Integrated Shipping compare across the metrics that matter most. COSCO Shipping operates the larger fleet. COSCO Shipping offers the wider port coverage. COSCO Shipping is the more carbon-efficient carrier. COSCO Shipping sails with Ocean Alliance, while ZIM Integrated Shipping belongs to Independent.

Frequently asked questions

Is COSCO Shipping or ZIM Integrated Shipping the bigger carrier?

COSCO Shipping operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which is greener, COSCO Shipping or ZIM Integrated Shipping?

COSCO Shipping is the more carbon-efficient carrier, with a lower EEDI across its fleet.

Which carrier has wider coverage, COSCO Shipping or ZIM Integrated Shipping?

COSCO Shipping calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are COSCO Shipping and ZIM Integrated Shipping headquartered?

COSCO Shipping is headquartered in Shanghai, China, while ZIM Integrated Shipping is based in Haifa, Israel.

Which alliances do COSCO Shipping and ZIM Integrated Shipping belong to?

COSCO Shipping is part of Ocean Alliance, while ZIM Integrated Shipping sails with Independent.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)