Side-by-side comparison of COSCO Shipping and ZIM Integrated Shipping across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.


ZIM Integrated Shipping has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
Major oil spills
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
Here is how COSCO Shipping and ZIM Integrated Shipping compare across the metrics that matter most. COSCO Shipping operates the larger fleet. COSCO Shipping offers the wider port coverage.
COSCO Shipping operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.
COSCO Shipping calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.
COSCO Shipping is headquartered in Shanghai, China, while ZIM Integrated Shipping is based in Haifa, Israel.
Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.
Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.