COSCO Shipping vs Pacific International Lines
Side-by-side comparison of COSCO Shipping and Pacific International Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.
COSCO Shipping
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Founded
- 1961
- Alliance
- —
vs
Pacific International Lines
- Headquarters
- Singapore, Singapore
- Founded
- 1967
- Alliance
- —
At a glance
- Fleet size:COSCO Shipping
- Container fleet capacity:COSCO Shipping
- Ports covered:COSCO Shipping
- Annual revenue:COSCO Shipping
Ranking positions
COSCO Shipping vs Pacific International Lines: full comparison
Fleet & capacity
Metric
COSCO Shipping
Pacific International Lines
Fleet size
516 ships
101 ships
Container fleet capacity
3.1 M TEU
0.4 M TEU
Volume transported
21.5 M TEU
2.5 M TEU
Owned terminals
38
20
Global presence
Metric
COSCO Shipping
Pacific International Lines
Ports covered
606
95
Maritime lines
404
67
Countries of presence
144
90
Environmental impact
Metric
COSCO Shipping
Pacific International Lines
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
46.8 gCO₂/TEU·km
—
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
16,655 ktCO₂eq
2,881 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
0
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
0 %
1.9 %
Business profile
Metric
COSCO Shipping
Pacific International Lines
Annual revenue
23.9 B$
2.9 B$
Alliance
Ocean Alliance
Independent
Year established
1961
1,967
Safety
Metric
COSCO Shipping
Pacific International Lines
Worker fatalities
0
0
Lost-time injury frequency
—
0.71
Training per employee
32 h/yr
37.9 h/yr
Environmental deep dive
Pacific International Lines has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
COSCO Shipping46.8 gCO₂/TEU·km
Pacific International Lines—
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
COSCO Shipping16,655 ktCO₂eq
Pacific International Lines2,881 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
COSCO Shipping0
Pacific International Lines0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
COSCO Shipping0 %
Pacific International Lines1.9 %
COSCO Shipping vs Pacific International Lines: the verdict
Here is how COSCO Shipping and Pacific International Lines compare across the metrics that matter most. COSCO Shipping operates the larger fleet. COSCO Shipping offers the wider port coverage.
Frequently asked questions
Is COSCO Shipping or Pacific International Lines the bigger carrier?▼
COSCO Shipping operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.
Which carrier has wider coverage, COSCO Shipping or Pacific International Lines?▼
COSCO Shipping calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.
Where are COSCO Shipping and Pacific International Lines headquartered?▼
COSCO Shipping is headquartered in Shanghai, China, while Pacific International Lines is based in Singapore, Singapore.
Related comparisons
Other COSCO Shipping comparisons
Other Pacific International Lines comparisons
Pacific International Lines vs A.P. Moller - MaerskPacific International Lines vs Mediterranean Shipping CompagnyPacific International Lines vs Wan Hai LinesPacific International Lines vs ZIM Integrated ShippingPacific International Lines vs Yang Ming LinePacific International Lines vs Evergreen marine Corporation OR Evergreen Line
Explore each carrier in detail
Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.
Safecube
Container tracking
Track your containers across 200+ carriers
Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.