Skip to main content

COSCO Shipping vs Pacific International Lines

Side-by-side comparison of COSCO Shipping and Pacific International Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

COSCO Shipping logo

COSCO Shipping

Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Founded
1961
Alliance
Ocean Alliance
vs
Pacific International Lines logo

Pacific International Lines

Headquarters
Singapore, Singapore
Founded
1967
Alliance
Independent

At a glance

  • Fleet size:COSCO Shipping
  • Container fleet capacity:COSCO Shipping
  • Ports covered:COSCO Shipping
  • Annual revenue:COSCO Shipping

COSCO Shipping vs Pacific International Lines: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
COSCO Shipping
Pacific International Lines
Fleet size
516 ships
101 ships
Container fleet capacity
3.3 M TEU
0.389 M TEU
Volume transported
21.5 M TEU
2.5 M TEU
Owned terminals
38
20

Global presence

Metric
COSCO Shipping
Pacific International Lines
Ports covered
606
95
Maritime lines
404
67
Countries of presence
144
90

Environmental impact

Metric
COSCO Shipping
Pacific International Lines
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
46.8 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
16,655 ktCO₂eq
2,881 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
0
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
0 %
1.9 %

Business profile

Metric
COSCO Shipping
Pacific International Lines
Annual revenue
23.9 B$
2.9 B$
Alliance
Ocean Alliance
Independent
Year established
1961
1967

Safety

Metric
COSCO Shipping
Pacific International Lines
Worker fatalities
0
0
Lost-time injury frequency
0.71
Training per employee
32 h/yr
37.9 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

Pacific International Lines has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

COSCO Shipping46.8 gCO₂/TEU·km
Pacific International Lines

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

COSCO Shipping16,655 ktCO₂eq
Pacific International Lines2,881 ktCO₂eq

Major oil spills

COSCO Shipping0
Pacific International Lines0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

COSCO Shipping0 %
Pacific International Lines1.9 %

COSCO Shipping vs Pacific International Lines: the verdict

Here is how COSCO Shipping and Pacific International Lines compare across the metrics that matter most. COSCO Shipping operates the larger fleet. COSCO Shipping offers the wider port coverage. COSCO Shipping sails with Ocean Alliance, while Pacific International Lines belongs to Independent.

Frequently asked questions

Is COSCO Shipping or Pacific International Lines the bigger carrier?

COSCO Shipping operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which carrier has wider coverage, COSCO Shipping or Pacific International Lines?

COSCO Shipping calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are COSCO Shipping and Pacific International Lines headquartered?

COSCO Shipping is headquartered in Shanghai, China, while Pacific International Lines is based in Singapore, Singapore.

Which alliances do COSCO Shipping and Pacific International Lines belong to?

COSCO Shipping is part of Ocean Alliance, while Pacific International Lines sails with Independent.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)