Side-by-side comparison of COSCO Shipping and Ocean Network Express across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.
Ocean Network Express has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
Major oil spills
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
Here is how COSCO Shipping and Ocean Network Express compare across the metrics that matter most. COSCO Shipping operates the larger fleet. COSCO Shipping offers the wider port coverage. Ocean Network Express is the more carbon-efficient carrier.
COSCO Shipping operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.
Ocean Network Express is the more carbon-efficient carrier, with a lower EEDI across its fleet.
Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.
COSCO Shipping calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.
COSCO Shipping is headquartered in Shanghai, China, while Ocean Network Express is based in Singapore, Singapore.


Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.