Side-by-side comparison of COSCO Shipping and A.P. Moller - Maersk across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.


COSCO Shipping has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
Total waste
Major oil spills
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
32 published rates
32 published rates
Here is how COSCO Shipping and A.P. Moller - Maersk compare across the metrics that matter most. A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet. COSCO Shipping offers the wider port coverage. COSCO Shipping is the more carbon-efficient carrier.
A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.
COSCO Shipping is the more carbon-efficient carrier, with a lower EEDI across its fleet.
COSCO Shipping calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.
COSCO Shipping is headquartered in Shanghai, China, while A.P. Moller - Maersk is based in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.
Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.