Side-by-side comparison of COSCO Shipping and Mediterranean Shipping Compagny across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
Total waste
Here is how COSCO Shipping and Mediterranean Shipping Compagny compare across the metrics that matter most. Mediterranean Shipping Compagny operates the larger fleet. COSCO Shipping offers the wider port coverage. Mediterranean Shipping Compagny is the more carbon-efficient carrier.
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.
Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.
Major oil spills
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
Mediterranean Shipping Compagny is the more carbon-efficient carrier, with a lower EEDI across its fleet.
COSCO Shipping calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.
COSCO Shipping is headquartered in Shanghai, China, while Mediterranean Shipping Compagny is based in Geneva, Switzerland.


32 published rates
32 published rates
Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.