Skip to main content

COSCO Shipping vs Mediterranean Shipping Company

Side-by-side comparison of COSCO Shipping and Mediterranean Shipping Company across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

COSCO Shipping logo

COSCO Shipping

Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Founded
1961
Alliance
Ocean Alliance
vs
Mediterranean Shipping Company logo

Mediterranean Shipping Company

Headquarters
Geneva, Switzerland
Founded
1970
Alliance
Independent (former 2M)

At a glance

  • Fleet size:Mediterranean Shipping Company
  • Container fleet capacity:Mediterranean Shipping Company
  • Ports covered:COSCO Shipping
  • Carbon efficiency (EEDI):Mediterranean Shipping Company
  • Annual revenue:Mediterranean Shipping Company

COSCO Shipping vs Mediterranean Shipping Company: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
COSCO Shipping
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Fleet size
516 ships
880 ships
Container fleet capacity
3.3 M TEU
6.3 M TEU
Volume transported
21.5 M TEU
24.5 M TEU
Owned terminals
38
48

Global presence

Metric
COSCO Shipping
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Ports covered
606
520
Maritime lines
404
300
Countries of presence
144
155

Environmental impact

Metric
COSCO Shipping
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
46.8 gCO₂/TEU·km
42.1 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
16,655 ktCO₂eq
33,046 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
—
366 kt
Major oil spills
0
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
0 %
4 %

Business profile

Metric
COSCO Shipping
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Annual revenue
23.9 B$
91.1 B$
Alliance
Ocean Alliance
Independent (former 2M)
Year established
1961
1970

Safety

Metric
COSCO Shipping
Mediterranean Shipping Company
Worker fatalities
0
5
Lost-time injury frequency
—
2.89
Training per employee
32 h/yr
23 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

Mediterranean Shipping Company has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

COSCO Shipping46.8 gCO₂/TEU·km
Mediterranean Shipping Company42.1 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

COSCO Shipping16,655 ktCO₂eq
Mediterranean Shipping Company33,046 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

COSCO Shipping—
Mediterranean Shipping Company366 kt

Major oil spills

COSCO Shipping0
Mediterranean Shipping Company0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

COSCO Shipping0 %
Mediterranean Shipping Company4 %

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

COSCO Shipping

51
Ships
2.54
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions →

Mediterranean Shipping Company

602
Ships
12.24
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions →

Demurrage & detention rates

COSCO Shipping

  • Antwerp, Belgium20
  • Antwerp, Belgium40
  • Antwerp, Belgium20
  • Antwerp, Belgium40
  • Bremerhaven, Germany20
  • Bremerhaven, Germany40
  • Bremerhaven, Germany20
  • Bremerhaven, Germany40
  • Hamburg, Germany20
  • Hamburg, Germany40
  • Hamburg, Germany20
  • Hamburg, Germany40
  • Long Beach, USA20
  • Long Beach, USA40
  • Long Beach, USA20
  • Long Beach, USA40
  • Los Angeles, USA20
  • Los Angeles, USA40
  • Los Angeles, USA20
  • Los Angeles, USA40
  • New York/New Jersey, USA20
  • New York/New Jersey, USA40
  • New York/New Jersey, USA20
  • New York/New Jersey, USA40
  • Rotterdam, Netherlands20
  • Rotterdam, Netherlands40
  • Rotterdam, Netherlands20
  • Rotterdam, Netherlands40
  • Valencia, Spain20
  • Valencia, Spain40
  • Valencia, Spain20
  • Valencia, Spain40

32 published rates

Mediterranean Shipping Company

  • Antwerp, Belgium20
  • Antwerp, Belgium40
  • Antwerp, Belgium20
  • Antwerp, Belgium40
  • Bremerhaven, Germany20
  • Bremerhaven, Germany40
  • Bremerhaven, Germany20
  • Bremerhaven, Germany40
  • Hamburg, Germany20
  • Hamburg, Germany40
  • Hamburg, Germany20
  • Hamburg, Germany40
  • Long Beach, USA20
  • Long Beach, USA40
  • Long Beach, USA20
  • Long Beach, USA40
  • Los Angeles, USA20
  • Los Angeles, USA40
  • Los Angeles, USA20
  • Los Angeles, USA40
  • New York/New Jersey, USA20
  • New York/New Jersey, USA40
  • New York/New Jersey, USA20
  • New York/New Jersey, USA40
  • Rotterdam, Netherlands20
  • Rotterdam, Netherlands40
  • Rotterdam, Netherlands20
  • Rotterdam, Netherlands40
  • Valencia, Spain20
  • Valencia, Spain40
  • Valencia, Spain20
  • Valencia, Spain40

32 published rates

COSCO Shipping vs Mediterranean Shipping Company: the verdict

Here is how COSCO Shipping and Mediterranean Shipping Company compare across the metrics that matter most. Mediterranean Shipping Company operates the larger fleet. COSCO Shipping offers the wider port coverage. Mediterranean Shipping Company is the more carbon-efficient carrier. COSCO Shipping sails with Ocean Alliance, while Mediterranean Shipping Company belongs to Independent (former 2M).

Frequently asked questions

Is COSCO Shipping or Mediterranean Shipping Company the bigger carrier?▼

Mediterranean Shipping Company operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which is greener, COSCO Shipping or Mediterranean Shipping Company?▼

Mediterranean Shipping Company is the more carbon-efficient carrier, with a lower EEDI across its fleet.

Which carrier has wider coverage, COSCO Shipping or Mediterranean Shipping Company?▼

COSCO Shipping calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are COSCO Shipping and Mediterranean Shipping Company headquartered?▼

COSCO Shipping is headquartered in Shanghai, China, while Mediterranean Shipping Company is based in Geneva, Switzerland.

Which alliances do COSCO Shipping and Mediterranean Shipping Company belong to?▼

COSCO Shipping is part of Ocean Alliance, while Mediterranean Shipping Company sails with Independent (former 2M).

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)