ICO Shipping vs A.P. Moller - Maersk

ICO Shipping

Headquarters: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Founded: 2008
Alliance: Independent

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Headquarters: Copenhagen, Denmark
Founded: 1904
Alliance: Gemini Cooperation

At a glance

Fleet size:A.P. Moller - Maersk
Ports covered:A.P. Moller - Maersk

Ranking positions

A.P. Moller - Maersk

ICO Shipping vs A.P. Moller - Maersk: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric

ICO Shipping

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Fleet size

8 ships

715 ships

Container fleet capacity

—

4.4 M TEU

Volume transported

—

11.9 M TEU

Owned terminals

—

Global presence

Metric

ICO Shipping

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Ports covered

374

Maritime lines

330

Countries of presence

—

130

Environmental impact

Metric

ICO Shipping

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

—

48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

—

34,168 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

—

533 kt

Major oil spills

—

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

—

1.1 %

Business profile

Metric

ICO Shipping

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Annual revenue

—

51.1 B$

Alliance

Independent

Gemini Cooperation

Year established

2008

1904

Safety

Metric

ICO Shipping

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Worker fatalities

—

Lost-time injury frequency

—

1.11

Environmental deep dive

ICO Shipping and A.P. Moller - Maersk are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

ICO Shipping—

A.P. Moller - Maersk48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

ICO Shipping—

A.P. Moller - Maersk34,168 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

ICO Shipping—

A.P. Moller - Maersk533 kt

Major oil spills

ICO Shipping—

A.P. Moller - Maersk0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

ICO Shipping—

A.P. Moller - Maersk1.1 %

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

ICO Shipping

—

A.P. Moller - Maersk

197

Ships

6.68

CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions →

ICO Shipping vs A.P. Moller - Maersk: the verdict

Here is how ICO Shipping and A.P. Moller - Maersk compare across the metrics that matter most. A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet. A.P. Moller - Maersk offers the wider port coverage. ICO Shipping sails with Independent, while A.P. Moller - Maersk belongs to Gemini Cooperation.

Frequently asked questions

Is ICO Shipping or A.P. Moller - Maersk the bigger carrier?▼

A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which carrier has wider coverage, ICO Shipping or A.P. Moller - Maersk?▼

A.P. Moller - Maersk calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are ICO Shipping and A.P. Moller - Maersk headquartered?▼

ICO Shipping is headquartered in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, while A.P. Moller - Maersk is based in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Which alliances do ICO Shipping and A.P. Moller - Maersk belong to?▼

ICO Shipping is part of Independent, while A.P. Moller - Maersk sails with Gemini Cooperation.

Related comparisons

Other ICO Shipping comparisons

ICO Shipping vs Mediterranean Shipping Compagny ICO Shipping vs Pacific International Lines ICO Shipping vs Wan Hai Lines ICO Shipping vs ZIM Integrated Shipping ICO Shipping vs Yang Ming Line ICO Shipping vs Evergreen marine Corporation OR Evergreen Line

Other A.P. Moller - Maersk comparisons

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Mediterranean Shipping Compagny A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Pacific International Lines A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Wan Hai Lines A.P. Moller - Maersk vs ZIM Integrated Shipping A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Yang Ming Line A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Evergreen marine Corporation OR Evergreen Line

See all carrier comparisons

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

View ICO Shipping profile View A.P. Moller - Maersk profile

Safecube

Container tracking

Recommended

Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube