Skip to main content

Kambara Kisen vs Pacific International Lines

Side-by-side comparison of Kambara Kisen and Pacific International Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

Kambara Kisen logo

Kambara Kisen

Headquarters
Fukuyama City, Japan
Founded
1903
Alliance
vs
Pacific International Lines logo

Pacific International Lines

Headquarters
Singapore, Singapore
Founded
1967
Alliance
Independent

At a glance

  • Fleet size:Pacific International Lines
  • Container fleet capacity:Pacific International Lines
  • Ports covered:Pacific International Lines

Kambara Kisen vs Pacific International Lines: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
Kambara Kisen
Pacific International Lines
Fleet size
7 ships
101 ships
Container fleet capacity
0.008 M TEU
0.389 M TEU
Volume transported
2.5 M TEU
Owned terminals
20

Global presence

Metric
Kambara Kisen
Pacific International Lines
Ports covered
65
95
Maritime lines
67
Countries of presence
13
90

Environmental impact

Metric
Kambara Kisen
Pacific International Lines
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
2,881 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
1.9 %

Business profile

Metric
Kambara Kisen
Pacific International Lines
Annual revenue
2.9 B$
Alliance
Independent
Year established
1903
1967

Safety

Metric
Kambara Kisen
Pacific International Lines
Worker fatalities
0
Lost-time injury frequency
0.71
Training per employee
37.9 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

Kambara Kisen and Pacific International Lines are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

Kambara Kisen
Pacific International Lines2,881 ktCO₂eq

Major oil spills

Kambara Kisen
Pacific International Lines0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

Kambara Kisen
Pacific International Lines1.9 %

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

Kambara Kisen

Pacific International Lines

9
Ships
0.01
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions

Kambara Kisen vs Pacific International Lines: the verdict

Here is how Kambara Kisen and Pacific International Lines compare across the metrics that matter most. Pacific International Lines operates the larger fleet. Pacific International Lines offers the wider port coverage.

Frequently asked questions

Is Kambara Kisen or Pacific International Lines the bigger carrier?

Pacific International Lines operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which carrier has wider coverage, Kambara Kisen or Pacific International Lines?

Pacific International Lines calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are Kambara Kisen and Pacific International Lines headquartered?

Kambara Kisen is headquartered in Fukuyama City, Japan, while Pacific International Lines is based in Singapore, Singapore.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)