Kambara Kisen vs A.P. Moller - Maersk

Kambara Kisen

Headquarters: Fukuyama City, Japan
Founded: 1903
Alliance: —

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Headquarters: Copenhagen, Denmark
Founded: 1904
Alliance: Gemini Cooperation

At a glance

Fleet size:A.P. Moller - Maersk
Container fleet capacity:A.P. Moller - Maersk
Ports covered:A.P. Moller - Maersk

Ranking positions

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Kambara Kisen vs A.P. Moller - Maersk: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric

Kambara Kisen

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Fleet size

7 ships

715 ships

Container fleet capacity

0.008 M TEU

4.4 M TEU

Volume transported

—

11.9 M TEU

Owned terminals

—

Global presence

Metric

Kambara Kisen

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Ports covered

374

Maritime lines

—

330

Countries of presence

130

Environmental impact

Metric

Kambara Kisen

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

—

48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

—

34,168 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

—

533 kt

Major oil spills

—

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

—

1.1 %

Business profile

Metric

Kambara Kisen

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Annual revenue

—

51.1 B$

Alliance

—

Gemini Cooperation

Year established

1903

1904

Safety

Metric

Kambara Kisen

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Worker fatalities

—

Lost-time injury frequency

—

1.11

Environmental deep dive

Kambara Kisen and A.P. Moller - Maersk are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

Kambara Kisen—

A.P. Moller - Maersk48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

Kambara Kisen—

A.P. Moller - Maersk34,168 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

Kambara Kisen—

A.P. Moller - Maersk533 kt

Major oil spills

Kambara Kisen—

A.P. Moller - Maersk0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

Kambara Kisen—

A.P. Moller - Maersk1.1 %

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

Kambara Kisen

—

A.P. Moller - Maersk

197

Ships

6.68

CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions →

Kambara Kisen vs A.P. Moller - Maersk: the verdict

Here is how Kambara Kisen and A.P. Moller - Maersk compare across the metrics that matter most. A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet. A.P. Moller - Maersk offers the wider port coverage.

Frequently asked questions

Is Kambara Kisen or A.P. Moller - Maersk the bigger carrier?▼

A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which carrier has wider coverage, Kambara Kisen or A.P. Moller - Maersk?▼

A.P. Moller - Maersk calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are Kambara Kisen and A.P. Moller - Maersk headquartered?▼

Kambara Kisen is headquartered in Fukuyama City, Japan, while A.P. Moller - Maersk is based in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Related comparisons

Other Kambara Kisen comparisons

Kambara Kisen vs Mediterranean Shipping Compagny Kambara Kisen vs Pacific International Lines Kambara Kisen vs Wan Hai Lines Kambara Kisen vs ZIM Integrated Shipping Kambara Kisen vs Yang Ming Line Kambara Kisen vs Evergreen marine Corporation OR Evergreen Line

Other A.P. Moller - Maersk comparisons

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Mediterranean Shipping Compagny A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Pacific International Lines A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Wan Hai Lines A.P. Moller - Maersk vs ZIM Integrated Shipping A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Yang Ming Line A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Evergreen marine Corporation OR Evergreen Line

See all carrier comparisons

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

View Kambara Kisen profile View A.P. Moller - Maersk profile

Safecube

Container tracking

Recommended

Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube