Skip to main content

Sarjak Container Lines vs ZIM Integrated Shipping

Side-by-side comparison of Sarjak Container Lines and ZIM Integrated Shipping across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

Sarjak Container Lines logo

Sarjak Container Lines

Headquarters
Mumbai, India
Founded
2003
Alliance
—
vs
ZIM Integrated Shipping logo

ZIM Integrated Shipping

Headquarters
Haifa, Israel
Founded
1945
Alliance
Independent

At a glance

  • Ports covered:ZIM Integrated Shipping

Ranking positions

ZIM Integrated Shipping

Sarjak Container Lines vs ZIM Integrated Shipping: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
Sarjak Container Lines
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Fleet size
—
147 ships
Container fleet capacity
—
0.78 M TEU
Volume transported
—
3.36 M TEU
Owned terminals
—
0

Global presence

Metric
Sarjak Container Lines
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Ports covered
275
335
Maritime lines
—
107
Countries of presence
84
90

Environmental impact

Metric
Sarjak Container Lines
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
—
63.6 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
—
5,524 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
—
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
—
20 %

Business profile

Metric
Sarjak Container Lines
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Annual revenue
—
5.16 B$
Alliance
—
Independent
Year established
2003
1945

Safety

Metric
Sarjak Container Lines
ZIM Integrated Shipping
Worker fatalities
—
0
Lost-time injury frequency
—
1.1

Environmental deep dive

Sarjak Container Lines and ZIM Integrated Shipping are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

Sarjak Container Lines—
ZIM Integrated Shipping63.6 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

Sarjak Container Lines—
ZIM Integrated Shipping5,524 ktCO₂eq

Major oil spills

Sarjak Container Lines—
ZIM Integrated Shipping0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

Sarjak Container Lines—
ZIM Integrated Shipping20 %

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

Sarjak Container Lines

—

ZIM Integrated Shipping

8
Ships
0.18
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions →

Sarjak Container Lines vs ZIM Integrated Shipping: the verdict

Here is how Sarjak Container Lines and ZIM Integrated Shipping compare across the metrics that matter most. ZIM Integrated Shipping offers the wider port coverage.

Frequently asked questions

Which carrier has wider coverage, Sarjak Container Lines or ZIM Integrated Shipping?▼

ZIM Integrated Shipping calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are Sarjak Container Lines and ZIM Integrated Shipping headquartered?▼

Sarjak Container Lines is headquartered in Mumbai, India, while ZIM Integrated Shipping is based in Haifa, Israel.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)