Skip to main content

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Sarjak Container Lines

Side-by-side comparison of A.P. Moller - Maersk and Sarjak Container Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

A.P. Moller - Maersk logo

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Headquarters
Copenhagen, Denmark
Founded
1904
Alliance
Gemini Cooperation
vs
Sarjak Container Lines logo

Sarjak Container Lines

Headquarters
Mumbai, India
Founded
2003
Alliance
—

At a glance

  • Ports covered:A.P. Moller - Maersk

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Sarjak Container Lines: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Sarjak Container Lines
Fleet size
715 ships
—
Container fleet capacity
4.4 M TEU
—
Volume transported
11.9 M TEU
—
Owned terminals
74
—

Global presence

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Sarjak Container Lines
Ports covered
374
275
Maritime lines
330
—
Countries of presence
130
84

Environmental impact

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Sarjak Container Lines
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km
—
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
34,168 ktCO₂eq
—
Total waste
533 kt
—
Major oil spills
0
—
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
1.1 %
—

Business profile

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Sarjak Container Lines
Annual revenue
51.1 B$
—
Alliance
Gemini Cooperation
—
Year established
1904
2003

Safety

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Sarjak Container Lines
Worker fatalities
4
—
Lost-time injury frequency
1.11
—

Environmental deep dive

A.P. Moller - Maersk and Sarjak Container Lines are evenly matched on environmental performance.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

A.P. Moller - Maersk48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km
Sarjak Container Lines—

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

A.P. Moller - Maersk34,168 ktCO₂eq
Sarjak Container Lines—

Total waste

A.P. Moller - Maersk533 kt
Sarjak Container Lines—

Major oil spills

A.P. Moller - Maersk0
Sarjak Container Lines—

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

A.P. Moller - Maersk1.1 %
Sarjak Container Lines—

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

A.P. Moller - Maersk

197
Ships
6.68
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions →

Sarjak Container Lines

—

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs Sarjak Container Lines: the verdict

Here is how A.P. Moller - Maersk and Sarjak Container Lines compare across the metrics that matter most. A.P. Moller - Maersk offers the wider port coverage.

Frequently asked questions

Which carrier has wider coverage, A.P. Moller - Maersk or Sarjak Container Lines?▼

A.P. Moller - Maersk calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are A.P. Moller - Maersk and Sarjak Container Lines headquartered?▼

A.P. Moller - Maersk is headquartered in Copenhagen, Denmark, while Sarjak Container Lines is based in Mumbai, India.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)