Skip to main content

SITC Container Lines vs Wan Hai Lines

Side-by-side comparison of SITC Container Lines and Wan Hai Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

SITC Container Lines  logo

SITC Container Lines

Headquarters
Hong Kong , Hong Kong
Founded
1991
Alliance
vs
Wan Hai Lines logo

Wan Hai Lines

Headquarters
Taipei, Taiwan
Founded
1965
Alliance
Independent

At a glance

  • Fleet size:Wan Hai Lines
  • Container fleet capacity:Wan Hai Lines
  • Ports covered:Wan Hai Lines
  • Carbon efficiency (EEDI):Wan Hai Lines
  • Annual revenue:Wan Hai Lines

SITC Container Lines vs Wan Hai Lines: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
SITC Container Lines
Wan Hai Lines
Fleet size
116 ships
124 ships
Container fleet capacity
0.181 M TEU
0.496 M TEU
Volume transported
3.224 M TEU
2.8 M TEU
Owned terminals
14
7
Storage volume
239,000 m²

Global presence

Metric
SITC Container Lines
Wan Hai Lines
Ports covered
79
85
Maritime lines
76
55
Countries of presence
16
33

Environmental impact

Metric
SITC Container Lines
Wan Hai Lines
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
70.69 gCO₂/TEU·km
57.18 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
1,602,635 ktCO₂eq
4,449 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
0 %
0.8 %

Business profile

Metric
SITC Container Lines
Wan Hai Lines
Annual revenue
0.672 B$
3.04 B$
Alliance
Independent
Year established
1991
1965

Safety

Metric
SITC Container Lines
Wan Hai Lines
Worker fatalities
0
0
Lost-time injury frequency
0.6
5.84
Training per employee
26.5 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

Wan Hai Lines has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

SITC Container Lines 70.69 gCO₂/TEU·km
Wan Hai Lines57.18 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

SITC Container Lines 1,602,635 ktCO₂eq
Wan Hai Lines4,449 ktCO₂eq

Major oil spills

SITC Container Lines
Wan Hai Lines0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

SITC Container Lines 0 %
Wan Hai Lines0.8 %

SITC Container Lines vs Wan Hai Lines: the verdict

Here is how SITC Container Lines and Wan Hai Lines compare across the metrics that matter most. Wan Hai Lines operates the larger fleet. Wan Hai Lines offers the wider port coverage. Wan Hai Lines is the more carbon-efficient carrier.

Frequently asked questions

Is SITC Container Lines or Wan Hai Lines the bigger carrier?

Wan Hai Lines operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which is greener, SITC Container Lines or Wan Hai Lines?

Wan Hai Lines is the more carbon-efficient carrier, with a lower EEDI across its fleet.

Which carrier has wider coverage, SITC Container Lines or Wan Hai Lines?

Wan Hai Lines calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are SITC Container Lines and Wan Hai Lines headquartered?

SITC Container Lines is headquartered in Hong Kong , Hong Kong, while Wan Hai Lines is based in Taipei, Taiwan.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)