Skip to main content

Ocean Network Express vs SITC Container Lines

Side-by-side comparison of Ocean Network Express and SITC Container Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

Ocean Network Express logo

Ocean Network Express

Headquarters
Singapore, Singapore
Founded
2017
Alliance
Premier Alliance
vs
SITC Container Lines logo

SITC Container Lines

Headquarters
Hong Kong , Hong Kong
Founded
1991
Alliance
—

At a glance

  • Fleet size:Ocean Network Express
  • Container fleet capacity:Ocean Network Express
  • Ports covered:Ocean Network Express
  • Carbon efficiency (EEDI):Ocean Network Express
  • Annual revenue:Ocean Network Express

Ranking positions

Ocean Network Express vs SITC Container Lines: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
Ocean Network Express
SITC Container Lines
Fleet size
254 ships
116 ships
Container fleet capacity
1.9 M TEU
0.181 M TEU
Volume transported
12 M TEU
3.224 M TEU
Owned terminals
8
14

Global presence

Metric
Ocean Network Express
SITC Container Lines
Ports covered
244
79
Maritime lines
165
76
Countries of presence
120
16

Environmental impact

Metric
Ocean Network Express
SITC Container Lines
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
40.5 gCO₂/TEU·km
70.69 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
10,271 ktCO₂eq
1,602,635 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
0
—
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
0 %
0 %

Business profile

Metric
Ocean Network Express
SITC Container Lines
Annual revenue
14.5 B$
0.672 B$
Alliance
Premier Alliance
—
Year established
2017
1991

Safety

Metric
Ocean Network Express
SITC Container Lines
Worker fatalities
0
0
Lost-time injury frequency
—
0.6
Training per employee
10 h/yr
26.5 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

Ocean Network Express has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

Ocean Network Express40.5 gCO₂/TEU·km
SITC Container Lines70.69 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

Ocean Network Express10,271 ktCO₂eq
SITC Container Lines1,602,635 ktCO₂eq

Major oil spills

Ocean Network Express0
SITC Container Lines—

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

Ocean Network Express0 %
SITC Container Lines0 %

Verified fleet emissions (EU MRV)

Verified data reported under the EU MRV regulation (source: EMSA / THETIS-MRV).

Ocean Network Express

29
Ships
0.78
CO₂ 2025 (Mt)

View the fleet & its emissions →

SITC Container Lines

—

Ocean Network Express vs SITC Container Lines: the verdict

Here is how Ocean Network Express and SITC Container Lines compare across the metrics that matter most. Ocean Network Express operates the larger fleet. Ocean Network Express offers the wider port coverage. Ocean Network Express is the more carbon-efficient carrier.

Frequently asked questions

Is Ocean Network Express or SITC Container Lines the bigger carrier?▼

Ocean Network Express operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which is greener, Ocean Network Express or SITC Container Lines?▼

Ocean Network Express is the more carbon-efficient carrier, with a lower EEDI across its fleet.

Which carrier has wider coverage, Ocean Network Express or SITC Container Lines?▼

Ocean Network Express calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are Ocean Network Express and SITC Container Lines headquartered?▼

Ocean Network Express is headquartered in Singapore, Singapore, while SITC Container Lines is based in Hong Kong , Hong Kong.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)