Skip to main content

Pacific International Lines vs SITC Container Lines

Side-by-side comparison of Pacific International Lines and SITC Container Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

Pacific International Lines logo

Pacific International Lines

Headquarters
Singapore, Singapore
Founded
1967
Alliance
Independent
vs
SITC Container Lines  logo

SITC Container Lines

Headquarters
Hong Kong , Hong Kong
Founded
1991
Alliance

At a glance

  • Fleet size:SITC Container Lines
  • Container fleet capacity:Pacific International Lines
  • Ports covered:Pacific International Lines
  • Annual revenue:Pacific International Lines

Pacific International Lines vs SITC Container Lines : full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
Pacific International Lines
SITC Container Lines
Fleet size
101 ships
116 ships
Container fleet capacity
0.389 M TEU
0.181 M TEU
Volume transported
2.5 M TEU
3.224 M TEU
Owned terminals
20
14

Global presence

Metric
Pacific International Lines
SITC Container Lines
Ports covered
95
79
Maritime lines
67
76
Countries of presence
90
16

Environmental impact

Metric
Pacific International Lines
SITC Container Lines
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
70.69 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
2,881 ktCO₂eq
1,602,635 ktCO₂eq
Major oil spills
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
1.9 %
0 %

Business profile

Metric
Pacific International Lines
SITC Container Lines
Annual revenue
2.9 B$
0.672 B$
Alliance
Independent
Year established
1967
1991

Safety

Metric
Pacific International Lines
SITC Container Lines
Worker fatalities
0
0
Lost-time injury frequency
0.71
0.6
Training per employee
37.9 h/yr
26.5 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

Pacific International Lines has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

Pacific International Lines
SITC Container Lines 70.69 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

Pacific International Lines2,881 ktCO₂eq
SITC Container Lines 1,602,635 ktCO₂eq

Major oil spills

Pacific International Lines0
SITC Container Lines

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

Pacific International Lines1.9 %
SITC Container Lines 0 %

Pacific International Lines vs SITC Container Lines : the verdict

Here is how Pacific International Lines and SITC Container Lines compare across the metrics that matter most. SITC Container Lines operates the larger fleet. Pacific International Lines offers the wider port coverage.

Frequently asked questions

Is Pacific International Lines or SITC Container Lines the bigger carrier?

SITC Container Lines operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which carrier has wider coverage, Pacific International Lines or SITC Container Lines ?

Pacific International Lines calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are Pacific International Lines and SITC Container Lines headquartered?

Pacific International Lines is headquartered in Singapore, Singapore, while SITC Container Lines is based in Hong Kong , Hong Kong.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)