Skip to main content

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs SITC Container Lines

Side-by-side comparison of A.P. Moller - Maersk and SITC Container Lines across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

A.P. Moller - Maersk logo

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Headquarters
Copenhagen, Denmark
Founded
1904
Alliance
Gemini Cooperation
vs
SITC Container Lines  logo

SITC Container Lines

Headquarters
Hong Kong , Hong Kong
Founded
1991
Alliance

At a glance

  • Fleet size:A.P. Moller - Maersk
  • Container fleet capacity:A.P. Moller - Maersk
  • Ports covered:A.P. Moller - Maersk
  • Carbon efficiency (EEDI):A.P. Moller - Maersk
  • Annual revenue:A.P. Moller - Maersk

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs SITC Container Lines : full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
SITC Container Lines
Fleet size
715 ships
116 ships
Container fleet capacity
4.4 M TEU
0.181 M TEU
Volume transported
11.9 M TEU
3.224 M TEU
Owned terminals
74
14

Global presence

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
SITC Container Lines
Ports covered
374
79
Maritime lines
330
76
Countries of presence
130
16

Environmental impact

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
SITC Container Lines
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km
70.69 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
34,168 ktCO₂eq
1,602,635 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
533 kt
Major oil spills
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
1.1 %
0 %

Business profile

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
SITC Container Lines
Annual revenue
51.1 B$
0.672 B$
Alliance
Gemini Cooperation
Year established
1904
1991

Safety

Metric
A.P. Moller - Maersk
SITC Container Lines
Worker fatalities
4
0
Lost-time injury frequency
1.11
0.6
Training per employee
26.5 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

A.P. Moller - Maersk has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

A.P. Moller - Maersk48.2 gCO₂/TEU·km
SITC Container Lines 70.69 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

A.P. Moller - Maersk34,168 ktCO₂eq
SITC Container Lines 1,602,635 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

A.P. Moller - Maersk533 kt
SITC Container Lines

Major oil spills

A.P. Moller - Maersk0
SITC Container Lines

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

A.P. Moller - Maersk1.1 %
SITC Container Lines 0 %

A.P. Moller - Maersk vs SITC Container Lines : the verdict

Here is how A.P. Moller - Maersk and SITC Container Lines compare across the metrics that matter most. A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet. A.P. Moller - Maersk offers the wider port coverage. A.P. Moller - Maersk is the more carbon-efficient carrier.

Frequently asked questions

Is A.P. Moller - Maersk or SITC Container Lines the bigger carrier?

A.P. Moller - Maersk operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which is greener, A.P. Moller - Maersk or SITC Container Lines ?

A.P. Moller - Maersk is the more carbon-efficient carrier, with a lower EEDI across its fleet.

Which carrier has wider coverage, A.P. Moller - Maersk or SITC Container Lines ?

A.P. Moller - Maersk calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are A.P. Moller - Maersk and SITC Container Lines headquartered?

A.P. Moller - Maersk is headquartered in Copenhagen, Denmark, while SITC Container Lines is based in Hong Kong , Hong Kong.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)