Skip to main content

SITC Container Lines vs Yang Ming Line

Side-by-side comparison of SITC Container Lines and Yang Ming Line across fleet, coverage, emissions and performance.

SITC Container Lines  logo

SITC Container Lines

Headquarters
Hong Kong , Hong Kong
Founded
1991
Alliance
vs
Yang Ming Line logo

Yang Ming Line

Headquarters
Keelung, Taiwan
Founded
1972
Alliance
Premier Alliance

At a glance

  • Fleet size:SITC Container Lines
  • Container fleet capacity:Yang Ming Line
  • Ports covered:SITC Container Lines
  • Carbon efficiency (EEDI):Yang Ming Line
  • Annual revenue:Yang Ming Line

SITC Container Lines vs Yang Ming Line: full comparison

Fleet & capacity

Metric
SITC Container Lines
Yang Ming Line
Fleet size
116 ships
98 ships
Container fleet capacity
0.181 M TEU
0.72 M TEU
Volume transported
3.224 M TEU
4.58 M TEU
Owned terminals
14
5

Global presence

Metric
SITC Container Lines
Yang Ming Line
Ports covered
79
70
Maritime lines
76
90
Countries of presence
16
87

Environmental impact

Metric
SITC Container Lines
Yang Ming Line
Carbon efficiency (EEDI)
70.69 gCO₂/TEU·km
37.9 gCO₂/TEU·km
Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)
1,602,635 ktCO₂eq
4,294 ktCO₂eq
Total waste
19,951 kt
Major oil spills
0
Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet
0 %
0 %

Business profile

Metric
SITC Container Lines
Yang Ming Line
Annual revenue
0.672 B$
4.6 B$
Alliance
Premier Alliance
Year established
1991
1972

Safety

Metric
SITC Container Lines
Yang Ming Line
Worker fatalities
0
0
Lost-time injury frequency
0.6
1.46
Training per employee
26.5 h/yr
23 h/yr

Environmental deep dive

Yang Ming Line has the lower environmental footprint across the metrics compared here.

Carbon efficiency (EEDI)

SITC Container Lines 70.69 gCO₂/TEU·km
Yang Ming Line37.9 gCO₂/TEU·km

Annual fleet CO₂ (Scope 1)

SITC Container Lines 1,602,635 ktCO₂eq
Yang Ming Line4,294 ktCO₂eq

Total waste

SITC Container Lines
Yang Ming Line19,951 kt

Major oil spills

SITC Container Lines
Yang Ming Line0

Biofuel / dual-fuel fleet

SITC Container Lines 0 %
Yang Ming Line0 %

SITC Container Lines vs Yang Ming Line: the verdict

Here is how SITC Container Lines and Yang Ming Line compare across the metrics that matter most. SITC Container Lines operates the larger fleet. SITC Container Lines offers the wider port coverage. Yang Ming Line is the more carbon-efficient carrier.

Frequently asked questions

Is SITC Container Lines or Yang Ming Line the bigger carrier?

SITC Container Lines operates the larger fleet of the two, based on number of ships in service.

Which is greener, SITC Container Lines or Yang Ming Line?

Yang Ming Line is the more carbon-efficient carrier, with a lower EEDI across its fleet.

Which carrier has wider coverage, SITC Container Lines or Yang Ming Line?

SITC Container Lines calls at more ports worldwide, giving it the broader global network.

Where are SITC Container Lines and Yang Ming Line headquartered?

SITC Container Lines is headquartered in Hong Kong , Hong Kong, while Yang Ming Line is based in Keelung, Taiwan.

Explore each carrier in detail

Dive into full profiles, rankings and performance data for either carrier.

Safecube
Container tracking
Recommended
Track your containers across 200+ carriers

Safecube aggregates all your carriers into a single dashboard: predictive ETAs, milestone alerts and D&D forecasting — no per-company portal.

Try Safecube (opens in a new tab)